New protest laws affect anti-csg efforts

 


Script

Narrator: Australia’s Mining sector has come under particular scrutiny this week. With Adani’s Carmichael mine gaining its final approval and new amendments to the Inclosed Land Act passing State parliament in the fortnight prior.

The amendments to the Inclosed Lands Protection Act , the Crimes Act, and the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act were assented on the 22nd of March to create the The Inclosed Lands, Crimes and Law Enforcement Amendment (Interference) Act of 2016.

The act heightens the offence of unlawful entry on inclosed lands, increasing the penalty from $550 to $5,500. This maximum penalty relates to land on which a business being operated and where the offender interferes or risks the organisation of the business.

The act also permits additional search and seizure powers to police officers. In situations which an officer suspects (on reasonable grounds) that a person has any materials which are intended to be used to lock-on or secure a person to any plant, equipment or structure for the purpose of interfering or risking the operation of a business, or personal safety of any person.

In addition the act also removes limitations to police powers to give directions in public places to prevent obstructions of persons or traffic in the case of demonstrations, protests, processions or organised assemblies.

This legislation has a similar storyline in Tasmania where the state government increased penalties for protesters intervened loggers, in an attempt to deter people from being a nuisance to logging activities.

 

Christopher McCaughtrie (Talent #1): This law is far more in the scope of big business interests of granting uninterrupted access to mining land (or on some level maintain contracts and tendors between multinationals and the government), than the interests of the public in terms of safety.

What I believe this legislation is more about is the undermining of public outcries against mining operations.

 

Talent #2: Legal advice obtained by the program claims similar action is evident all over NSW. Stating It’s not about public safety so much as its about deterrence and it comes at a critical time for the NSW government. 

On the whole, royalties from the resources industry are dropping with a global downturn in iron and coal, and NSW need to attract new resource development in other areas.  Protesters have been a hindrance for CSG operators.

So by making it tougher for protesters to protest, it makes it easier for operators to drill for coal seam gas and therefore more attractive to invest in that area of resources. 

However the moratorium on mining which forced NSW government to reviewing is coal seam gas licensing regime, is set to be lifted.

This means the NSW government will be ready to start issuing licences soon, and raises suspicion that CSG activity will pick up.

With protesters out of the way, it’s likely NSW will see a huge increase in CSG activity as soon as global oil and gas prices are raised.

 

Narrator: This latest legislation follows five strategic bills, which passed parliament on the 21st of October 2015.

With Adani finalising the approval for its Carmichael mine in the weeks following The Inclosed Lands Act, it appears as though NSW government is establishing new avenues for CSG mining in the future.


 

References:

Carter Newell, Overhaul of New South Wales mining and petroleum regime, Lexology, Lexology.com, viewed 2 April 2016 < http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7276aa10-15f0-40f4-a49a-071263e720f9 >.

Inclosed Lands, Crimes and Law Enforcement Legislation Amendment (Interference) Bill 2016 (NSW).

McCullogh Roberston, Amendment seeking a balance between the right to peaceful protest with the need to ensure public safety, Lexology, Lexology.com, viewed 2 April 2016 < http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4caa5c02-0960-48b7-bfc1-816c5382fa72 >.

Samples (Creative Commons License):

Charlie Pickering, The Project, via gasileaks, 2013.

Chainsaw, Esperri, via freesound, 2011.

The Avalanches, Frontier Psychiatrist, 2009.

The Cinematic Orchestra, Burn Out, 2002.

 

UOW decided, no debate necessary, marriage equality needed

IMG_1364

Despite the recent controversy surrounding the same-sex marriage debate, the University of Wollongong has united in support, with both the Liberal and Labor political clubs agreeing – marriage equality is necessary. Although other universities have remained quiet on the issue, UOW’s Liberal club remains the only Liberal student political party to openly support same sex marriage. Club President, Sam Tedeschi, stated that it’s a simple issue of, “equality before the law”. While UOW’s Labor Club President Dillion Weightman, when speaking to UOWTV Multimedia , agreed, it’s a positive sign that both clubs can agree upon such an important issue.

Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s decision to strike down his party’s right to a conscience vote on the Marriage Act amendment, which would see the legalisation of same sex marriage, drew criticism from political club President and students alike.

“The decision goes against the core principles of the Liberal party,” stated Mr Tedeschi.

Mr Tedeschi does however agree with Education Minister Christopher Pyne, in that, a referendum isn’t the best option.

“He’s right, there is no legal grounding.”

While student, Kurtis Hughes, stated he was devastated with Abbott’s decision, “to be completely honest with you, I nearly cried.” Although he does fear a potential referendum will hurt the campaign, stating it would increase “the risk of the legislation failing”.

Mr Hughes states that all the back and forth discussion is ‘infuriating’ and implies that he, and the LGBTQ+ community, are viewed as ‘second-class citizens’. Mr Hughes describes the prospect of marriage equality as ‘phenomenal’, stating he would feel ‘more confident’ with his sexuality if he were to be considered “legally and socially equal,”

“It would prove to the thousands of kids still struggling with their sexuality or gender-identity that the world is changing, and they shouldn’t be afraid anymore.”

Mi Mummy’s Mazda, the perfect first car?

Specs: 2012 Mazda 2 (5 door sedan)
Bought used at $12,000
47,000kms at time of purchase

 

As your typical mooching early-twenty-something (and by mooching I mean retail doesn’t pay enough to become financially independent) I have been driving my Mum’s car for around 2 years now, and it goes all right. Let me clarify by stating, I’m fairly oblivious to the nuances of auto mechanics, but I will do my best to explain the pro’s and con’s of the 2012 Mazda 2 (Sedan).

Recently my Mother and I were looking at new cars to possibly replace the Mazda. I’ve dubbed it the ‘Silver Fox’, because it’s sleek and foxy but also silver, duh. We had three options at our disposal:

  1. Mum upgrades and I retain the Silver Fox, provided that my savings go towards the purchase of said upgrade
  2. I buy a poo-box with my measly five grand in savings
  3. The planets align, my parents upgrade their car and gift me the Silver Fox

So there we were mulling around some Shire car yards, and the sales person asked why I would bother buying a new car myself, stating the Silver Fox is “the perfect first car”. In my opinion (keeping in mind that he’s probably been selling cars longer than I have been alive, but I drive this car so you know, I have more intimate knowledge) his statement is misguided. I should also point out that the crux of my argument does rely upon my own motoring skills, which is something my parents won’t attest for. In many ways the Silver Fox is the perfect first car, it’s small but roomy, it’s pretty looking (if bubble car is your thing), it’s a good town car to zip around in.

However in saying that, this car does not possess a powerful engine. If throwing doughies is your thing, then sorry, this is not the car for you. So back to the Danny Devito lookalike’s statement, lack of burn out ability does not a perfect car make, according to 70% of male P-platers living within a ten-kilometre radius of my house. But in all seriousness, I would say that this car is more so pony-powered, than horse-powered. Even the slightest of hills, or take-off from a red light, is enough for the Silver Fox to redline. I’m not a lead foot, but if you don’t floor it after stopping, this car literally won’t move. So I guess if you are a Sydney driver, this car also isn’t for you – sorry.

Yet I would say the lack of power isn’t its worst quality, for me this might even be a good thing. The Silver Fox’s most dangerous pitfall is its blind spots. Like any Japanese import, the interior is plastic fantastic, but not so fantastic when it impinges shoulder checks. The window dividers are quite large, in terms of width, and I often find myself looking into the backseat window to check my blind spot. Without trying the negate responsibility, I would argue that this what led to the Silver Fox’s (and yours truly’s) first prang. ‘Easy to crash’, perhaps not the best aspect of a first car.

I’m probably selling the Silver Fox a bit short. It is a decent car, it could even be described as ‘cute’, but it’s a car better suited to experienced drivers – think latte-sipping-young-professional.

All in all, I’d give the Mazda 2 (Sedan) 3.5 nonchalant ‘mehs’ out of 5.

Long-term relationships in your 20s, when sh*t has the possibility of “getting real”

Remember dating in your teens, or perhaps pre-teens (you saucy minx, you)? How great was that. I mean, not the awkward hormones stage, but the freedom of essentially having a non-existent breakup. Back in the early 2000s you could literally text someone “ur dumped” and veto any commitment or guilt. Especially if you included an ironic emoticon, a smiley face to soften the emotional blow.

Nowadays most late 90s babies are hitting their 20s, and burgeoning life commitments often include significant others. While some welcome this growing responsibility (read: half my Facebook newsfeed) I, however, react to the thought of full blown emotional commitment by shrinking in a corner while the music from the shower scene of Psycho plays in my mind. Honestly I commend those who decide to wed young, I wish I had that faith in my choices – I got a tattoo two years ago and I’m already 5 sessions deep in laser removal. Unfortunately marriage isn’t something that can be lasered away, and if I can’t even settle on a tattoo, I couldn’t even contemplate a legally binding document. Aren’t the words LEGALLY BINDING enough to send shivers down your spine?

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not against relationships, I’ve been in monogamous rapture for four and half years now. But I feel, as a twenty something, once you exceed the standard 18-month expiration date, there is this crushing pressure of ‘get married or break up’. It might be the casual “you guys should get married” yip from a friend, or something more dramatic, like your boyfriend’s grandmother telling you that “it’s been a long time since I’ve had a new grandchild” to add to her photo wall.

With that being said, I think it’s time gen y addressed this obsession over long-term relationships. Seriously it’s not 1988 anymore, I’m sick of old gals telling me at my age they were ‘married with two kids’. That’s cool, if that’s your thing don’t let me stop you, go forth and populate, but I shouldn’t have to feel pressured to commit myself to anyone or anything. And if I hear another person (cough, baby boomer, cough) ranting about how kids these days are selfish, lazy, dependant, yadda yadda, I will get vocal. By getting vocal I mean I will scream sassy remarks in my head while staring viciously into their back.

Wouldn’t it be great if those older generations thought along the lines of “oh I see, by not getting married and shooting out children, young people these days are bettering themselves, ensuring that when they do have children they can support them properly”. Also I could have, and probably should have, pointed out (to the lovely middle aged lady) that in 1988 perhaps getting married was one of the better options at a woman’s disposal. However in 2015, I would like to believe that earning myself an education and career is something to be celebrated, not something labelled as self serving. Alternatively, I would happily jump on the marriage bandwagon (a day of white dresses and attention, what’s not to love?), if I could annul it via email or text.

A Night out with Bill & James

11304255_10205824888334841_993698608_n

One of the perks of having a chef boyfriend, (I should clarify – he is unqualified, “have you seen what they pay apprentices?” he says, indignantly) is knowing where all the up and coming foodie spots are. So on Saturday night me and my, very-happy-on-a-casuals-wage-thank-you-very-much, boyfriend headed out to his ex-colleagues new restaurant in, wait for it, Balgownie. Despite the lingering housing commission stigma, Balgownie is actually quite trendy – its village is thriving with new businesses, something that not many people would know, unless you go there. Bill and James is a café and restaurant, open 7 days, which also does all day service on Fridays and Saturdays. Owner and Head Chef, Aaron ‘Az’ Anderson, opened the doors just a little over a year ago. The floor space has also expanded in that time, to seat 56 people at full capacity.

11303471_10205824880014633_876977167_n

The menu

When we arrived one of the wait staff quickly ushered us to our table, reserved for ‘Sheriff’ – the nickname is a “kitchen joke” which, three years later, I still don’t understand the context of. ‘Sheriff’ snatched away my menu, stating, “we’re getting the chef’s special”, and our ordering was done, finito, in all of 60 seconds. The waitress reassured me “don’t worry Az said he’ll take care of everything”, while pouring us a glass of LiquorLand’s finest $14 white wine (Bill and James is b.y.o only).

All together we ate ten dishes, two appetisers, three entrees, two mains, and, three desserts! I think we redefined the limitations of our stomachs, but it was worth it, all $120 (including tips) of it. I should say, the chef’s special is $65 a head, however Az gave us ‘mates rates’, hence the price disparity.

My favourite entree was the ‘seared scallops, butternut pumpkin, almond puree and crispy sage’. I love seafood, so I was excited to try this, but for those who aren’t so keen on seafood, this dish is the perfect introduction to scallops. They were cooked perfectly, tender and juicy, with that melt in your mouth quality, whilst still retaining the flesh structure. The puree and pumpkin were an unusual choice but it definitely made the dish. The buttery undertones bringing out the scallops sweetness, something that many places tend to overlook – in my opinion.

11349846_10205824881214663_1620518226_n

seared scallops, butternut pumpkin, almond puree and crispy sage

Yet there was a main where this sense of adventure missed the mark. The ‘jewfish, cauliflower squash, kale and fried chickpeas’ was not a personal favourite of mine. While the jewfish was cooked exquisitely, I found the kale and squash combination jarring, but perhaps that’s my inexperienced palette talking.

11281722_10205824881974682_1204108873_n

jewfish, cauliflower squash, kale and fried chickpeas

11420014_10205824887294815_274575097_n

Dessert platter, the ice cream didn’t last long enough to photograph

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s clear that Az is exploring new flavour combinations. To his credit, the menu, or the brief glance of it I had, was exciting and filled with fresh modern Australian twists. I’d say if you are looking for something different to try, this is the place for you.

11329636_10205824884734751_1642695224_n

Bill and James, yummy modern Australian food!

Rachel Hills: De-bunking ‘The Sex Myth’

Image via rachelhills.net

Image via rachelhills.net

She lives in New York and writes about sex – a lot – yet despite the obvious parallels, Rachel Hills is no Carrie Bradshaw. Rachel Hills is a passionate feminist, critic of pop culture stereotypes, and a sceptic of the media’s portrayal of sex. Her work has been featured in countless publications, both in print and online, and most recently she landed a book deal with major publishing company Simon and Schuster. Her first book, The Sex Myth: The Gap Between our Fantasies and Reality, is due to be released in Australia in July. She states that at the core of her writing is a “desire to explore ideas”.

We’ve spoken once before, we pinned it down to around 3 years ago. Back then Hills was living in London, skyping me from her flat; she was interviewing me for research for her book. This time around, it’s me asking her the questions, hoping that my nerves don’t show through too much. As the skype call connects, I remember the sound of Rachel’s voice, and my nerves relax a little. This time she’s in New York, I hear some noises in the background, and I imagine at she is out at swanky Manhattan event.

Hills appears to have the dream career of any journalism student. However it didn’t happen by chance. She’s successful, talented, determined, and incredibly hard working. Hills began her career, after graduating from the University of Sydney, as a freelance journalist. Over the last decade she’s written hundreds of articles, all while working various jobs, making appearances for public speaking events, and studying her post-graduate degree. Hills’s work has taken from her Australian homeland, to London, to New York- where she currently resides. Although Hills says that “it didn’t quite happen as directly as that”.

Hills reveals that things didn’t go quite to plan after graduation, but “it never does” she laughs. She describes her entrance into journalism, as “non-traditional”, or at least it was considered then. In 2004 she worked as the Editor in Chief of a project called electionTracker, which sent four young journalists around Australia in campaign buses alongside the major political parties. Hills says that it was around this time that she began “submitting articles to publications”. She says that it was working with other young writers, writers that she describes as “extremely talented”, that she realised “I could do what they did”. A lot of her freelance work was for magazines such as Cosmopolitan, which she believes is the perfect venue in which to discuss feminist ideals. Hills explains that women’s magazines are “essentially a media conversation about what it is to be a woman” and by being a contributor to such publications you can create new conversations, “ones that I think can be really helpful for people”.

I ask Hills what it feels like now that her book is so close to its release, “very exciting and very scary” is her response. It’s been 8 years since she came up with the idea, and 7 since she began working on it. She says it’s funny in retrospect, recalling an old blog post in which she says, “this book could take an entire year or two to write, surely it should only take six months”. She reveals that she felt a sense of hopelessness at times, and that the lengthy writing process often led her to question her value as a human being. “To understand that sometimes things don’t happen as quickly as you want them to”, was a personal lesson, says Hills.

It wasn’t until after a late night conversation with her friend ‘Monica’, that Hills turned her pen towards the topic of sex. They were walking home from a party together, Hills recalls Monica confessing that she hadn’t had sex in almost two years. She turned to Hills and said “you know Rachel come May, it will be two years since I’ve had sex, and it will be one year since I kissed someone”. It was this revelation, eight years ago that led Hills to the concept of The Sex Myth. Hills admits that she never believed the sensationalised narrative of young people hooking up with strangers every weekend, which the media portrays as normal. However she did buy into the more “subtle, insidious undercurrent, that to be a socially successful young person meant being sexually active”. When someone who Hills perceived to very socially successful, “wasn’t having sex in the way we were told we were supposed to”, she was shocked. Hills has spoken in past interviews that in her 20s she felt like sex came easily to others, while describing herself as a “secret sexual loser hiding in the corner and hoping that no one would notice that I wasn’t ‘normal’”.

Hills undertook her own quantitative research for the book, including over 200 interviews and over one thousand emails. Her research found that not only is there not really a ‘normal’, pretty much everyone is normal, in that most people worry they are doing something wrong when it comes to their sex lives. Hills says the motivation for her research was to find out the thoughts of twenty somethings when it comes to sex. “The point is not for you to parrot my theories back to me. The point is for you to tell me what you think”, she says. Hills understanding of sex changed her in more ways than just one, researching The Sex Myth. She says she wasn’t alone in her realisations, lots of those interviewed worried that they weren’t living up to the media’s portrayal. “It made me realise that I wasn’t alone, not just in feeling frustration and anxiety about not living up to the media ideal… but in my more specific insecurities about being a 20+ virgin”, recalls Hills. Her experience as a twenty something virgin wasn’t the average; most people have sex for the first time in their late teens to early twenties, but it happened more than what she thought. She’s sure that she had a few friends that shared her experiences, but “it just wasn’t something we talked about”. Hills argues that sex isn’t bad at all, however it is the inflated ideal of sex as a measure of a person’s success, that causes so many people to become anxious around the subject. “It’s the fact that sex is positioned in our culture as being something that is so vitally important to who we are”, says Hills.

Hills also argues that the media’s sensationalised view of sex is too narrow and excludes particular types of sexual activity. She says while researching she learnt a big lesson, which would have allayed a lot of her younger self’s anxieties, and Hills believes it would also help a lot of other people’s insecurities. Which is that, too much importance has been placed on penetrative sex. “Penis in vagina sex isn’t the only valid – or most important – type of sex. Knowing that would have helped me because I wouldn’t have been so concerned about whether I’d done or not done that particular sexual act”, Hills explains. Again Hills reiterates, “I’m not saying intercourse is bad”, just that we would as a society benefit from not placing so much significance on it. Hills says that by doing this not only would we destigmatise sexual acts that aren’t considered heteronormative, but it would also “reduce the pressure people feel to orgasm” in that particular sexual act. Hills also believes this is important for couples as they tend to “measure their intimacy through how often they engage in penetrative sex”.

Now that she has a book under her belt, I asked Hills if she feels like she’s ‘made it’. “It’s really funny that you ask that, because I actually don’t”, she replies. She confesses that she felt more like she’d ‘made it’ when she was still living in Australia, five years ago. Hills feels that in terms of making the book a success, she has another mountain to climb. She says, “It’s this kind of scary precipice of will my dreams come true, or will they kind of fall into oblivion?” Hills hopes the book connects with an audience and opens new doors for her, in terms of different types of writing. Hills says she’d like to write another non-fiction book, but chose to keep the subject a secret “it hasn’t got anything to do with sex” she adds. Hills believes that The Sex Myth is better, in terms of writing and research, than anything she’s written before. “It’s the most worthwhile kind of writing that I could be doing” concludes Hills.

 

Rachel Hills’ first book, The Sex Myth: The Gap Between our Fantasies and Reality, is available in Australia on July 29th (Penguin Books), and on August 4th in America (Simon and Schuster).

Image via rachelhills.net

Is Chinese freedom a humanitarian cause we’ve forgotten?

Yesterday marked the 26th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. On that day more than one thousand pro-democracy student-demonstrators were killed at the hands of People’s Republic of China’s soldiers. Even today public acknowledgement of that event is forbidden by the Chinese government. Recognition of the historical significance of Tiananmen Square is often larger outside of China itself, with many young people either unaware of the details, or unwilling to admit their knowledge.

This year Chinese students had another movement to reflect on. In 2014 Occupy Hong Kong a civil disobedience movement was sparked in response to students’ desires to elect their own leaders. Despite the Occupy movement appearing to slow down without any political changes, younger people are increasingly aware of the parallels between current events and those of Tiananmen Square.

Due to the different progression of both the economy and society under British rule, Hong Kong is considered the most liberal part of China. It is the only Chinese city allowed to hold a mass public ceremony for the June 4th event. However students are just as dissatisfied with the superficial vigil that is held each year. Cameron Chan a 20-year-old student told The Wall Street Journal, “Every year it’s the same, we sing the same songs and watch the same videos. For some people, going to the vigil is a bit like clocking in,” said Mr. Chan. “Should we continue looking back on a historical event, or focus on the more urgent situation here now?”

The fractures amongst pro-democracy activists and event organisers resulted in multiple vigils. This year there was also special mention of activists who have been imprisoned on the mainland after the wake of the Occupy Hong Kong and other likeminded protests. Two hundred people were arrested for voicing their support of pro-democracy movements, from September to December last year, of which over twenty remain in prison.

With the increased media attention, some have speculated whether this is a new identity crisis for Hong Kong-ers. The older generation do not appear to be interested in the cries of democracy on the mainland, while the many of younger generation believe Chinese democracy hasn’t progressed far enough. Internet censorship has recently come under fire with the recent boom in the Asian electronic industry.

In China if you search terms such as ‘Tibetan independence’ or, more simply, ‘environmental issues’ you are likely to be met with an error message. This year alone, Reporters Without Borders ranked China number 176 out of 180 countries in their press freedom list. It ranked just ahead of Eritrea, North Korea, Turkmenistan, and Syria. This year was worse than last; China has already dropped a position from 175.

The Chinese government heavily censors the media, even though the public has access to Internet, their Internet isn’t the same as ours. It’s commonplace for current affairs to be blocked by the government’s filters, whereas some websites cannot be accessed at all.

Sites like Facebook, Blogger, YouTube, and Twitter are all blocked in China. Instead, China has it’s own versions, which are monitored closely. However a common loophole is utilising virtual private networks (VPN’s): internet browsing services which can be installed on mobile phones and other devices, which are able to negate China’s firewall and filtering system. VPN’s are posing a threat of the government due to the explosion in personal device popularity. With more and more people using mobiles to access the Internet, the government is running out of ways to control the media that’s accessible. Disruptions to VPN’s happen periodically, it is also common for VPN speed to slow down in the lead up to political events, for this reason many VPN users tend to give up.

According to Reporters Without Borders, there were at least 48 hackers behind bars in 2014. Those are the people who make VPN’s possible. But that doesn’t include journalists who are being held on bogus criminal charges. Perhaps one of the most notable Chinese journalists is Gao Yu. Yu has received multiple journalism awards, including the Golden Pen of Freedom, which she won in 1995. However Yu has also been arrested multiple times, the first came in 1989 following the Tiananmen Square protests.

Last year Yu was arrested again on charges of ‘divulging state secrets to persons outside the country’. Allegedly, Yu sent a confidential government document to German broadcaster, Deutsche Welle, which she was also a regular contributor to. Yet the Chinese government did not confirm what document had been used. According to media reports at the time, they claimed they had solid proof of Yu’s crime. Following her arrest, Yu ‘confessed’ to her crime in a video. However, late last year, the BBC reported that during Yu’s pre-trial hearing she claims to have falsely admitted to her crime because the police were threatening to arrest her son. Sadly, this story is a common one for Chinese journalists.

The Chinese governments past explanations for censoring include the need to restrict ‘harmful’ content, such as pornography. Many western media outlets believe this is a weak scapegoat to controlling freedom of information and the press.

These fractions in desires for China’s future will surely have an interesting result, only time will tell if the outcome will be as explosive as past events. However it does raise the question of whether we have done enough? Or have we forgotten about China?

Whaaaaaat another (another) blog!?

Hello to my readers (if I have any), a bit of shameless self promotion here, but anyway…

I’ve recently completed my final assignment for JRNL102 (woah that went quick!). I decided to make a new blog for this because I want it to be an ongoing project outside of uni, and if assignment concepts relate I’ll use the site to host them.

If you were interested in my Project Proposal, head over to The Era Lands to check out the final result!

Multimedia Write Up

NYT’s Tomato Can Blues

While I liked the artistic qualities of this project it came in second place for me.

Pros:

The scrolling feature was coooooool as ice. I liked that you could make the pictures move (I’m a child I know).

The illustrations were a nice touch, it was something different!

They shared the project via social media (duh right?), but I think they did a good job in interesting the hipster types.

Cons:

It wasn’t that great on my iPhone 4s, soz NYT

There was a lot of text! The moving pictures got a bit distracting but maybe I’m just infantile

The Guardian’s Firestorm

This was my favourite

Pros:

the videos and audio enhanced the written word, it was all encapsulating. I did not get distracted reading this!

The map and text helped add to my understanding, and since the video/photography and audio created a emotional connection, I actually wanted to know more.

They promoted this piece with the news stories already written about it, the maintained readers interest.

It worked on my iPhone 4s ziiiing!

Cons:

No hyperlinks 😦

Overall both were super creative and interesting (even if the subject matter was a bit heart breaking).

Project Proposal

DSCF4137“What’s Hidden?”

I knew exactly what I wanted to do for this story. I wanted to focus on the place where my holiday shack is, Era. It’s more then just a shack but you guys will have to wait and see.

Era is hidden in two ways:

1. Era is literally hidden in the bush

2. Era’s community is hidden from outsiders as you really have to had grown up in this community and experienced the history to fully understand the nature of Era.

It will sound like:
-birds chirping
-waves crashing
-the bush
-crackling fires
-people talking
-music

The piece will draw inspiration from a Max Dupain photo essay of Era I saw a few years ago. The photos will be black and white, but will fade into colour. There will be both photos and video. It will feature as many people possible both young and old (Era has a diverse personality).

I plan on creating a separate website for my piece with additonal information like a history timeline and gallery etc.